Shockwaves have been felt all throughout India after the live-streamed shooting of former lawmaker Atiq Ahmed and his brother, Ashraf Ahmed. Because it occurred while the two individuals were in police custody, the incident has prompted severe concerns about the rule of law in Uttar Pradesh and the protection of citizens while they are in police custody. This article will analyze the circumstances behind Atiq Ahmed shooting Video. Following nhankimcuonganthu.com !
I. The Shooting of Atiq Ahmed on Live Video
The shooting on live video of former Indian politician Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf Ahmed has shaken the country. The video, which has now gone viral, shows Ahmed and his brother being shot dead by unknown assailants while in police custody. The frightening video shows Ahmed and his brother being encircled by police and journalists as three gunmen dressed as journalists approach and open fire at close range. The shooting was filmed on live television, and millions of people in India watched it.
Lavlesh Tiwari, Arun Maurya, and Sunny Singh have been identified as the perpetrators. The three males were detained by police soon following the shooting. According to authorities, the attackers arrived on motorbikes and pretended to be journalists in order to gain access to Ahmed and his brother. After shooting Ahmed and his brother, they were swiftly overwhelmed and apprehended by police.
Lavlesh Tiwari, one of the attackers, is reputedly a history-sheeter with a lengthy criminal record, including charges of murder and extortion. Tiwari allegedly hired the other two attackers, Arun Maurya and Sunny Singh, to carry out the shooting.
Former Indian politician Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf Ahmed were killed in the shooting. Atiq Ahmed was a convicted kidnapper receiving a life term in prison and a former member of India’s parliament. Ashraf Ahmed, his brother, was a former state legislator.
The killing of the Ahmed brothers came just days after the death of Atiq Ahmed’s son, Asad Ahmed, in a police encounter. Asad Ahmed and an accomplice were both accused of a recent murder and were slain by police in a gunfight. In a petition to India’s Supreme Court, Atiq Ahmed voiced worry for his safety, stating that he and his family had been wrongly accused in the Umesh Pal murder case and that he could be assassinated in a bogus encounter by the Uttar Pradesh Police.
The shooting occurred in the northern city of Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, which has seen a rash of arbitrary executions and police encounters in recent years. Uttar Pradesh is India’s most populous state, with a population of about 200 million people. According to the independent Association for Democratic Reforms monitoring group, the state is also notorious for its high crime rate, with hundreds of lawmakers from all parties across India facing criminal charges.
Atiq Ahmed has a lengthy criminal record, with over 100 cases filed against him, including kidnapping and murder charges. On March 26, he was taken to Prayagraj from the high-security Sabarmati Central Jail in Gujarat’s Ahmedabad to appear in court in the Umesh Pal kidnapping case from 2006. The court sentenced Ahmed and two defendants to life in prison in the kidnapping case on March 28.
The shooting event has generated major concerns about the rule of law in Uttar Pradesh, as well as the safety of civilians detained by police. The tragedy also emphasizes the importance of increased transparency and accountability in law enforcement organizations, as well as the need for political leaders to safeguard the safety of all residents. The police have initiated an investigation, and Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has appointed a three-member judicial commission to look into the incident. Political leaders from all parties criticized the incident and expressed alarm about the state’s prevalence of extrajudicial brutality.
II. Atiq Ahmed’s Criminal Record
A. Kidnapping conviction
Former Indian politician Atiq Ahmed, who was recently assassinated live on camera, has a lengthy criminal history. At the time of his passing, Ahmed was incarcerated for life after being found guilty of abduction. He served four terms as a local lawmaker and once as a member of the Indian parliament.
Ahmed has been charged with murder and kidnapping since he was just 17 years old, according to his criminal history. Ahmed was accused of abducting businessman Umesh Pal in 2006; the case was never resolved. On March 26, Ahmed was transported from Gujarat’s high-security Sabarmati Central Jail to Prayagraj in order to appear in court in connection with the kidnapping of Umesh Pal. On March 28, the court handed down a life sentence for Ahmed and two other defendants in the kidnapping case.
B. Cases Involved With Ahmed
In addition to the kidnapping case involving Umesh Pal, Atiq Ahmed was accused with murder, extortion, and kidnapping in more than 100 other incidents. Ahmed reportedly had a violent past and had accumulated a considerable fortune through unlawful means.
Ahmed had a well-established support system that enabled him to avoid capture and carry out his illicit enterprise. Additionally, he was reported to be connected to powerful figures in the state of Uttar Pradesh, including legislators.
C. Protection Petition
Prior to his passing, Atiq Ahmed had petitioned India’s top court for protection, stating that he and his family had been wrongly accused of being involved in the murder of Umesh Pal and that the Uttar Pradesh Police may kill him in a phony encounter.
Ahmed’s appeal emphasized the need for more accountability and transparency in law enforcement institutions as well as the frequency of extrajudicial violence in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Given his criminal history and the state’s political climate, Ahmed had expressed concern for his safety as well as the safety of his family.
D. Violence outside of the law in Uttar Pradesh
Atiq Ahmed’s shooting on live television has brought up important issues regarding the frequency of extrajudicial violence in the state of Uttar Pradesh. In recent years, the state has witnessed a wave of extrajudicial executions and police encounters.
Concerns have been expressed by human rights organizations regarding the use of extrajudicial violence in Uttar Pradesh and other regions of India by law enforcement forces. In recent years, more than 180 suspects have been killed in Uttar Pradesh during alleged “police encounters,” which human rights organizations claim frequently result in extrajudicial killings.
Political leaders from different parties have expressed displeasure over the occurrence and expressed concerns about the state’s rule of law. A three-member judicial commission has been established by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath to look into the incident in addition to the police probe that has already begun.
The episode has also brought attention to the necessity for law enforcement authorities to be more open and accountable, as well as for political leaders to guarantee the safety of all citizens, including those who have criminal records. Making sure that all legal procedures are followed and that people are not the targets of extrajudicial brutality is crucial.
III. Political Response and Investigation
Chief Minister’s Response
The live-streamed shooting of Atiq Ahmed has outraged Indian political figures and raised concerns about law and order. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has launched an investigation and promised to punish the perpetrators.
Adityanath has formed a three-member judicial commission to investigate and bring the perpetrators to justice. He has told the public that the state administration will preserve law and order and that no one will be permitted to break the law.
The police identified the three gunmen who shot Atiq Ahmed and his brother after a comprehensive investigation. According to reports, the attackers dressed as journalists and fired multiple bullets at the victims at close range.
The police are interrogating the three suspects about their motives and ties. They also took their weapons and are examining the crime scene for evidence.
Yogi Adityanath’s three-member judicial commission will investigate and make recommendations to prevent such events. The commission will examine law enforcement’s role in public safety and state order.
A retired judge will lead the commission and invite witnesses and collect evidence. It will report to the government within a set timeframe and offer suggestions to prevent such events.
The live-streamed shooting of Atiq Ahmed highlighted concerns about human rights breaches in Uttar Pradesh and the need for law enforcement transparency and accountability. Human rights groups believe police interactions and extrajudicial violence in the state target marginalized people and criminals.
Political leaders must protect all individuals, regardless of criminal past or political party, as the episode has shown. To prevent extrajudicial violence and human rights violations, due process must be observed in all cases.
The incident has ignited a debate on law and order in India and the need for systemic reforms to improve law enforcement accountability and transparency. Human rights groups must be addressed by the government to provide dignity and respect for all citizens.
Citizens and political leaders alike have expressed concern about the rule of law and the safety of people detained by the police in India following the shooting of Atiq Ahmed on live television. It is still unclear whether the victims and their families will receive justice as the inquiry progresses. The tragedy emphasizes the requirement for increased accountability and transparency in law enforcement organizations as well as for political leaders to guarantee the protection of all individuals.
A. Who carried out the attacks?
Lavlesh Tiwari, Arun Maurya, and Sunny Singh—three assailants who pretended to be journalists—were named.
B. Who were the casualties?
Atiq Ahmed, a former Indian politician, and his brother Ashraf Ahmed were shot dead in the northern city of Prayagraj while being held by police.
C. What was the incident’s context?
Only a few days had passed since the death of Atiq Ahmed’s son in a police confrontation before the shooting occurred. When they were attacked, Ahmed and his brother were being taken to the hospital for a checkup.
D. How has the incident been viewed politically?
A three-person judicial commission has been established by the chief minister to look into the situation. Political figures from a range of parties have denounced the occurrence and expressed worries about the situation of the law in Uttar Pradesh.
E. How far along is the police investigation?
The three attackers have been detained by the police, who are interviewing them. The inquiry is still ongoing.
F. What are the issues with human rights?
Concerns have been expressed by human rights organizations over the frequency of extrajudicial violence in the state of Uttar Pradesh and the requirement for law enforcement organizations to guarantee the protection of individuals, particularly those who are detained by the police.
Please note that all information presented in this article has been obtained from a variety of sources, including wikipedia.org and several other newspapers. Although we have tried our best to verify all information, we cannot guarantee that everything mentioned is correct and has not been 100% verified. Therefore, we recommend caution when referencing this article or using it as a source in your own research or report.